The pain levels by percussion were significantly higher than that during the function and chewing tests (p<0.05). Results: The postoperative pain levels measured during the clinical tests and functions were significantly higher than the pain levels at rest (p<0.05). Finally, the pain levels were compared using Pearson’s correlation for the reliability of the test methods at a significance level of 95%. In addition, patients were asked to mark their pain levels on the same VAS after the clinical tests of percussion and chewing. Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on a vertical visual analog scale (VAS) while the relevant tooth was at rest and during function 24 h after the treatment. The entire treatment procedure was performed during a single visit by an experienced endodontist. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 asymptomatic necrotic teeth that required root canal treatment, one in each patient, were included. Objectives: This study aimed to compare pain intensity levels of a tooth at rest and in function, and percussion and chewingtests to verify a reliable clinical test method. The future research direction could be to alleviate the anxiety on the comprehensive efficacy of patients with low back pain. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the anxiety score had significant positive correlations with functional disability (ODI, p = 0.004 and 95% CI = 0.112–0.573 RMDQ, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.135–0.586) and psychological function (TSK, p = 0.001, 95% CI = 0.174–0.612), excellent positive correlation with quality of sleep (PASS, p = 0.025, 95% CI = 0.031–0.512), and strongly negative correlations with the quality of life (SF-36, p = 0.000, 95% CI = 0.761–0.433).Ĭonclusion: We recognized that anxiety in low back pain patients was mainly due to interaction with the intensity of pain, disability level, and a mass of psychological function. The analyses showed significant differences of pain intensity ( p = 0.034, disability (ODI, p = 0.007 RMDQ, p = 0.012) and psychological function (TSK, p = 0.000 PASS, p = 0.009 FABQ, p = 0.000 SF-36, p = 0.000 and PSQI, p = 0.000) between the two groups. Results: A total of 60 participants were enrolled after self-rated anxiety was assessed and the full investigation was finished. ![]() ![]() The pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale psychological function, using the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire functional disability, using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire quality of life using 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire and the quality of sleep using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the relationships between variables and anxiety scores were estimated using Spearman correlation analysis. In total, 60 subjects were divided into two groups based on self-rated anxiety scores: 30 patients with SAS score ≥50 were in the low back pain with anxiety group, and 30 for the LBP without anxiety group with SAS score <50. Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to analyze the differences in pain, disability, and psychological function in non-specific LBP patients with and without anxiety. The supplementary demonstrated the relationship between these influencing factors and anxiety. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there were differences in pain, dysfunction, and psychological factors between two groups. ![]() Chronic low back pain (LBP) reduces working hours, increases comorbidities, and increases rehabilitation needs. Objectives: Non-specific low back pain affects people of all ages and is a leading contributor to disease burden worldwide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |